Scientist knew in 2015 that mRNA v*ccines could alter DNA & the spike protein is a “toxin” that can cause serious damage, according to medical studies.
The information was revealed in a Senate Homeland Security hearing titled “Voices of the Vaccine-Injured.
Dr. Robert Malone, a physician and early mRNA researcher testified criticizing the C*VID-19 mRNA vaccines.
Malone argued that these shots represent an “experimental genetic modification platform” rather than a traditional v*ccine, with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein acting as a “toxin”
capable of causing widespread harm like clotting and inflammation—dangers he claimed were known since at least 2015 based on prior coron*virus studies.
“The mRNA v*ccine is actually an experimental genetic modification platform.”
“It delivers synthetic messenger RNA that hijacks your cellular machinery, forcing your own cells to churn out a foreign protein—the SARS-COV-2 spike.”
“This isn’t immunization; it’s reprogramming at the genetic level”
mRNA technology, which delivers instructions to cells to produce proteins, has been eyed for medical use since the 1990s, but by 2015, scientists were openly calling it a “genetic modification platform.”
A key paper that year in Expert Review of V*ccines described mRNA as a tool for “genetic reprogramming” of cells, warning it could alter protein production in ways that mimic gene therapy – without the permanence of DNA changes, but with risks like unintended immune reactions or off-target effects.
By 2015, researchers knew mRNA could integrate into cellular processes in unpredictable ways.
Studies highlighted how synthetic mRNA might trigger inflammation or even reverse-transcribe into DNA under certain conditions, potentially leading to long-term genetic issues.
This wasn’t abstract; labs were already testing it for cancer and infectious diseases, with early red flags about stability and delivery issues.
Fast-forward to C*VID where critics argue the v*ccine was never a “v*ccine” in the classic sense – like a weakened virus or protein subunit – but a high-tech genetic hack.
A 2023 review in Microbiology and Immunology echoed this, noting mRNA’s role in “genetic modification” was downplayed during the emergency rollout.
Critics say federal agencies like the FDA fast-tracked something experimental, mandating it for jobs and schools without fully disclosing the full scope of the v*ccine and its possible side effects.**********
The spike protein – the virus’s “key” for invading cells – was pegged as problematic well before COVID hit.
Research from 2005 onward on SARS-CoV-1 showed spikes causing vascular damage and inflammation, but by 2015, studies ramped up.
A paper in Virology Journal that year detailed how spike proteins from coron*viruses could trigger blood clots and heart issues in lab models, acting like a “pathogenic toxin” by binding to receptors everywhere from lungs to brain.
Pre-2020 work, including a 2015 analysis in Journal of Virology, warned spikes aren’t inert; they can shed, circulate, and provoke autoimmune storms.
Scientists knew engineered spikes (like in v*ccines) might amplify this, especially if they escaped the injection site – a risk confirmed in animal studies showing biodistribution to organs like the heart and ovaries.
Multiple 2022-2023 studies, including one in Circulation, detected free-floating spikes in the blood of young people who developed myocarditis after shots – levels up to 100 times higher than in healthy people.
A Trends in Molecular Medicine review called it the “spike hypothesis”: These proteins, meant to train immunity, can fuel inflammation mirroring severe C*VID itself.
Spike toxicity was documented pre-2015 in coron*virus research. Evidence shows they can circulate and cause rare but real harm, like the FDA’s 2025 label expansions for myocarditis in young men.
